@PeoriaChronicle : Depending on what folklore you believe....
Supposedly chili was derived from re-hydrating dried spiced beef chunks during long cattle drives from the SW to other parts of the country. Eventually, beans were added to feed the slave labor workers or prisoners because beans were cheaper. Tomato product was added after chili was domesticated and fresh ground or chunks of beef were used.
Ah, but alas, there are many other theories such as it came from Spain. Paprika as we know it today, is different than it used to be. Today it is mainly one pepper/chile that is used in the production. In the 1800s, there were regional differences and a blend of different chiles. These blends were eventually called chili powder and used to season more heavy flavored foods such as beef, pork, and lamb instead of dishes like paella. I don't know if there were ever beans in Spanish "Chili".
Another is a modification of tradition Hungarian Goulash (not the Americanized version that is ground beef and macaroni nonsense). Chunks of beef rubbed with lots of paprika and pepper (and sometimes caraway seed), browned (usually in bacon fat) with some onion and maybe carrot, liquid added (take your pick: water, stock, wine) and cooked until beef is tender and liquid reduced. Once again, bean-less.
I think no matter which theory one believes, beans were almost always an after thought.
My chili preference follows the Hungarian Goulash/Spain version. Chunks of beef heavily rubbed with a blend of different Chile Powders, browned with some onion and garlic, maybe some bell pepper, beef stock, tomato paste, more chili powder, and cook until beef starts to shred. Sometimes beans, sometimes not.