- - - - - - - -
>> So to say how many years of schooling to get this job also how much did you pay for schooling to get the job.
@tntrecycling:
I havent followed CAT engineering employment in decades. This has been quite an eye opener to put it mildly. I would say quite emphatically they are not anywhere near competing for engineering graduates, especially US citizens, as the graduates can get multiple offers working directly, not an agency, for cos. and starting at much higher levels too. It happens all the time. Some of the cos. are Boeing, Dupont, Texas Instruments. They recruit all the time on college campuses and come begging for engineering graduates that are US citizens so they dont have to deal with the visa issues that foreign born students have in order to work here.
This is disgraceful.
@billybob:
We're talking about two separate things here: Engineering vs. IT. IT grads may have a computer science degree, but Caterpillar has always held IT to not be a "core" competency, and as such, does not value IT as much as Mechanical and Design-type engineers.
Caterpillar does offer competitive compensation, for the few people that actually get hired direct. Agency and Contract employees are caught in a price war to the bottom by their respective companies. Bill rates vary wildly depending on the contract companies, which of course, includes Indian firms or firms that have Indian divisions.
This is my experience from being on both sides of the fence for ~10 years.
@joepyeweed
There isn't really a distinction between "agency" and "contract" employees, other than how it impacts head count. Neither is considered to be or not be "on-track" for potential hiring. The real difficulty in getting hired is that most positions that open up are filled internally before they are even visible to non-Cat employees, which is typical of any company.
Edit: JPW is correct, Cyient is not a bad company, neither is Larson and Toubro (formerly Dell, Perot Systems and eServ).