Epstein list.

www.pbs.org/newshour /politics/new-photos -from-epsteins-perso nal-collection-

What were the photos supposed to be evidence of? Connection? I feel like we all generally accepted the connection between so many elite - both democrat and republican, British and American (and so many others I am certain.) Is any of this evidence of wrong doing or simple guilt by association. We can accept that there were many bad actors associated with the man. I would rather see true evidence - because clearly we aren't prepared to just accept that a person is the company they keep as a means for voting differently.

@CornelliusRex : Trump has admitted to assaulting women and found guilty in court of it. I believe there's something here. Why else would he be so angry about them?

@CornelliusRex : Birds of a feather flock together.

I agree, but sans evidence, this is a lot of smoke in my mind. If the worst public face they could find to release, or amongst the release was Woody Allen - for F's sake - he married his step-daughter, we know he's horrid. That's like warning your kids to not go over to Mr Polanski's house for trick or treating. Unless these are going to release evidence, then let's move forward - not on. Keep going over them, but don't fan the fire until you have someone to burn in it.

@CornelliusRex :
Maybe listen to the women that were there as children?

@skutfarcus :
I am almost positive they want proof as well so that they can see action. We need to either build the case on circumstance or provide evidence. In the meantime, there is a great deal of action on other priorities such as economy, education, voting rights, judicial intimidation, due process on immigration issues, wrongful detainments, to name the first few that come to mind.

I have a few simple questions. ---
1. Is there evidence of sexual misconduct and human trafficking with minors that occurred at Epstein Island ?
2. If true, why aren't the investigations ongoing and made public?
3. Who are the guilty people in this horrific scenario?
4. Are the guilty being protected because of wealth and fame?

@CCubs :
Question #1 It is quite possible that human trafficking took place at Epstein Island. Not so sure about the sexual misconduct there. It seems like once they arrived at Epstein Island they were sent elsewhere.
King Charles and Camilla are really putting the heat on Andrew to talk, I think that when Charles was diagnosed with cancer, Andrew might have thought that Charles would be too sick or worse, The diagnosis sounds fairly good so Andrew will now have to deal with King Charles, Princess Ann and Camilla,

I guess I should have rephrased the question to be - Did the illegal activities take place [ANYWHERE] under the guidance of Epstein and Maxwell?

@CCubs :
According to things that come out in the foreign press yes it is quite likely that initially
things took place under the guidance of Maxwell and Epstein. It also seems possible things also took place in other places including foreign countries and on private planes to those places. It does seem nearly certain lots of things happened on private planes

So we agree that ALL guilty parties need to be investigated, incriminated, and incarcerated...... right?

@CCubs :
I hope so!!

There are frayed nerves mixed in with raised voices, sometimes screaming and yelling in DOJ as they rush frantically to meet the deadline for release of the Epstein documents. Consequently, there is an increased chance that they will ask for an extension. Chances are about 20% but that is an increase from earlier this week and earlier today.

An extension? I figured they'd just ignore the deadline, just like almost everyone else in this administration does in disregarding any laws or Constitution law...
My opinion and mine alone and not my employer's.