Don't miss what's happening in Peoria
People on Peoria.com are the first to know.
Go to top of page
Close
 
Close
Back

Epstein list.

Epstein list.

12
...
678
...
1819»
« Back
FASTLANE: This "Fastlane" discussion may cover sensitive topics. Repeated name-calling/insults may get you removed from a discussion. See Fastlane guidelines »
Have something to add to the discussion? Log in or sign up to comment.
Replies:
Message Menu
skutfarcus 13
~ 2 mos, 25 days ago    
He attacked his own supporters today for wanting answers.
Message Menu
CCubs Online 6 OP 
~ 2 mos, 25 days ago    
He attacked his own supporters today for wanting answers.
 
@skutfarcus :
It is beyond real.
It is beyond ridiculous.
It is beyond belief.
It is beyond insanity.
It is Trump's imaginary world.
Message Menu
DennisinPeoria 13
~ 2 mos, 25 days ago    
What's ironic or hypocritical is Speaker Mike Johnson believes the list should be released. But when Democrats submitted a resolution or amendment to require the release, guess what happened? Every House GOP voted against it. Figure that one out folks.
 
And then I saw a piece about Dershowitz, who, when interviewed, said no current office holders were on the list. And that 2 NY judges were suppressing the release, not DJT'S administration. On top of that, Dershowitz claims there really is no "list", just redacted affidavits from Epstein accusers.
thehill.com/homenews /administration/5401 288-dershowitz-judge s-suppressing-e
 
So that brings an interesting question: can this list be unredacted, and released without disclosing the names of the victims?
My opinion and mine alone and not my employer's.
Message Menu
CCubs Online 6 OP 
~ 2 mos, 24 days ago    
skutfarcus wants the Epstein Files released.
PeoriaChronicle does not want the Epstein Files released.
BIG DIFFERENCE!
Message Menu
CCubs Online 6 OP 
~ 2 mos, 24 days ago    
I don't believe you, I think you are lying.
Message Menu
billybob 14
~ 2 mos, 24 days ago    
What's ironic or hypocritical is Speaker Mike Johnson believes the list should be released. But when Democrats submitted a resolution or amendment to require the release, guess what happened? Every House GOP voted against it. Figure that one out folks. And then I saw a piece about Dershowitz, who, when interviewed, said no current office holders were on the list. And that 2 NY judges were suppressing the release, not DJT'S administration. On top of that, Dershowitz claims there really is no "list", just redacted affidavits from Epstein accusers. thehill.com/homenews /administration/5401 288-dershowitz-judge s-suppressing-e So that brings an interesting question: can this list be unredacted, and released without disclosing the names of the victims? My opinion and mine alone and not my employer's.
 
@DennisinPeoria :
Possibly,
Message Menu
CCubs Online 6 OP 
~ 2 mos, 24 days ago    
DennisinPeoria : Possibly,
 
@billybob : Possibly, sooner rather than later.
Message Menu
bn13814 14
~ 2 mos, 24 days ago    
I don't believe you, I think you are lying.
 
@CCubs : Your obsession makes no sense.
12
...
678
...
1819»
Post a comment »

** Would you be interested in keeping up to date with news & events going on in the Peoria area? Consider supporting an alternative social media platform for Peoria by creating an account today! (it's fast, easy, privacy focused, and free!)


FASTLANE: This "Fastlane" discussion may cover sensitive topics. Repeated name-calling/insults may get you removed from a discussion. See Fastlane guidelines »
« Back to Main Page
Views: 5,922
# Replies: 271

 
Peoria Park District
Own a local business? Create a business page to connect with neighbors and gain new customers. Learn more »