×
Weather Icon
74°
Chat8NewsReal EstateBusinessMore

FastlaneEpstein list.

FastlaneEpstein list.
Go to top of page
12
...
678
...
5859»
‹ Back
FASTLANE: This "Fastlane" discussion may cover sensitive, inflammatory, or controversial topics. See Fastlane guidelines »
Have something to add to the discussion? Log in or sign up to comment.
Replies:
Message Menu
skutfarcus Online 10k+
~ 10 mos ago   Jul 16, '25 4:01pm  
He attacked his own supporters today for wanting answers.
Reply
Message Menu
CCubs 1k+ OP 
~ 10 mos ago   Jul 16, '25 5:13pm  
He attacked his own supporters today for wanting answers.
 
@skutfarcus :
It is beyond real.
It is beyond ridiculous.
It is beyond belief.
It is beyond insanity.
It is Trump's imaginary world.
Reply
Message Menu
DennisinPeoria 10k+
~ 10 mos ago   Jul 16, '25 9:28pm  
What's ironic or hypocritical is Speaker Mike Johnson believes the list should be released. But when Democrats submitted a resolution or amendment to require the release, guess what happened? Every House GOP voted against it. Figure that one out folks.
 
And then I saw a piece about Dershowitz, who, when interviewed, said no current office holders were on the list. And that 2 NY judges were suppressing the release, not DJT'S administration. On top of that, Dershowitz claims there really is no "list", just redacted affidavits from Epstein accusers.
thehill.com/homenews /administration/5401 288-dershowitz-judge s-suppressing-e
 
So that brings an interesting question: can this list be unredacted, and released without disclosing the names of the victims?
My opinion and mine alone and not my employer's.
Reply
Message Menu
CCubs 1k+ OP 
~ 10 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 10:35am  
skutfarcus wants the Epstein Files released.
PeoriaChronicle does not want the Epstein Files released.
BIG DIFFERENCE!
Reply
Message Menu
CCubs 1k+ OP 
~ 10 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 10:57am  
I don't believe you, I think you are lying.
Reply
Message Menu
billybob 10k+
~ 10 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 11:13am  
What's ironic or hypocritical is Speaker Mike Johnson believes the list should be released. But when Democrats submitted a resolution or amendment to require the release, guess what happened? Every House GOP voted against it. Figure that one out folks. And then I saw a piece about Dershowitz, who, when interviewed, said no current office holders were on the list. And that 2 NY judges were suppressing the release, not DJT'S administration. On top of that, Dershowitz claims there really is no "list", just redacted affidavits from Epstein accusers. thehill.com/homenews /administration/5401 288-dershowitz-judge s-suppressing-e So that brings an interesting question: can this list be unredacted, and released without disclosing the names of the victims? My opinion and mine alone and not my employer's.
 
@DennisinPeoria :
Possibly,
Reply
Message Menu
CCubs 1k+ OP 
~ 10 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 1:06pm  
DennisinPeoria : Possibly,
 
@billybob : Possibly, sooner rather than later.
Reply
Message Menu
bn13814 5k+
~ 10 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 1:09pm  
I don't believe you, I think you are lying.
 
@CCubs : Your obsession makes no sense.
Reply
12
...
678
...
5859»
Post a comment »

** Would you be interested in keeping up to date with news & events going on in the Peoria area? Consider supporting an alternative social media platform for Peoria by creating an account today! (it's fast, easy, privacy focused, and free!)


FASTLANE: This "Fastlane" discussion may cover sensitive, inflammatory, or controversial topics. See Fastlane guidelines »
« Back to Chat
Views: 18,224
# Replies: 879

Don't miss what's happening in Peoria
People on Peoria.com are the first to know.