Second Amendment on the Peoria.com Forums - Page 4

And everyone of those you need to be in close cambat with your victim to use, not 500 meters away like a coward

So what? If someone has to be a coward about it, then they are a murderer and a coward. The end result is the same.

And that part I agree with.
I'm really not arguing with you so musch as I am pointing out a fact.

Me too, lol.

Ya but not to many kids find their old mans axe and accidentaly chop themselves to death...

I can debate that point, but I refuse to debate you, Foxy. Sorry.

No offense, Hipkat. The debates that you and I have are civil. I'm afraid that Foxy will not respect that.

"And everyone of those you need to be in close cambat with your victim to use, not 500 meters away like a coward"

Statements like this are one reason that the sheeple are so afraid of firearms. Most shootings take place inside of 5 yards and a lot of those shots fired are misses. Detroit released numbers on police involved shooting and 100% were within 10 yards and the officers had a hit rate below 15%. And these are the trained police doing the shooting.

It takes a lot of talent to hit a man sized target at 500 yards. Any you have to start with a rifle capable of doing that. No POS gang bangers Gat is going to make that shot even if the shooter was an Olympian.
I have trained very hard to become the marksman that I am today. It irks me that people who have shot grandpa's .22 a couple times or spent a week on that line at Ft. Benning think anyone can do it.
That said...at 500 yards, with me on the trigger...Don't run, you'll only die tired.

Debate who you choose, just because I got into it with one person on here has no relivance on my ability to have my point of view and respect that of others.
If you feel you have nothing to gain or learn from my opinion there isnt much I can do about it.
But I do come in peace.


btw...most of my post's are done in a comical sort of way, that somehow get lost in translation due to only being able to express yourself with limited expression, sometimes I find it odd how someone like HipKat can downright get to his point holding nothing back in a religious thread and that seems ok, but if a woman does the same thing it is taken as being attacking, if you just imagine George Carlins voice while reading my responces you might take me another way...it's just my style of posting, nothing to be taken to personal.

Fair enough. Being a woman has nothing to do with it. I would not even know you were a woman if not for your username and avatar. One observation that I have made (maybe erroneously) starts with your username. You continually make mention of your appearance, whether it be your modeling career, your avatar or your username. It seems to me that a large part of your personal identity comes from your appearance. On an internet forum, you may have your true inner self come out without appearance being an issue.

I am not trying to slam you or anything. I am just curious as to why you seem to constantly reinforce your physical appearance. It makes me wonder if you are trying to present your outer self to everyone over your inner self.

Maybe you are just goofing around, I don't know. I'm only pointing it out so that you can correct me if I'm wrong. I don't want to get the wrong impression.

hmm, I never really looked at it that way, and think I only mentioned my modeling career one time in another thread just to simply point out my profesional expierience. Dont think ive made any other refference to "how I look" and my avitar is a pic of me...can't do much about how I look, and Foxy as a user name is funny to me, like a jive talkin lady from the 70's sort of humour.
I appreciate you coming at me this way, I was simply trying to let you know Im not to be feared as some in your face b*tch on this board, because Im certainly not.
The lost in translation thing is so true though because I got my hand slapped for even replying to you in this thread and kinda told to go to my room.
peace


btw, keep in mind one thing, a little food for thought that might actually make a good thread all on its own, you said you wouldnt know Im a woman aside from my user name and avitar, but because of those two things, you do know Im a woman. Would I be less threatening if my user name was Butch, and I didnt look the way I do? If posting a picture that isnt an actual picture of me relevant to my discussion? Think about it. If I do say so myself HipKat is pretty hott, and his avitar pic shows him being an atractive man, and call me crazy but HipKat kinda sounds like the male version of Foxy, but no one has an issue with that.

Well, I hope that you weren't offended by my post. I wasn't trying to be harsh, but I think some other forum members may have gotten the same impression that I did. I wanted you to know so that you could state your case.

I would certainly be within my rights to refer to myself as 'Chiseled Hunk'....but I went with 'Dave' so as not to distract others from my words, lol. Just kidding.

When you use an adjective as your username, you are automatically describing yourself to others in a way that you want to be portrayed.

ah ha! No offence taken what so ever. Ya I was kinda shocked when a few people came at me like I was being bitchy or something, when I was being as nice (debatable and to the point) but nice as can be.
I really think that people make a lot of judgement based on a person's apperance, and my aperance should have nothing to do with my posting or debate style.
Very interesting to say the least....it aint easy being so Foxy, or a chiseled hunk is it.....

I'm not falling for that trap, lol......you're just trying to get me to start telling everyone about my modeling career and Playgirl offers to take the spotlight off of you.

BTW, love that picture of the Arch.
I went up in '84, when I got laid over for 2 dys on my way over seas.
Good times!
I loved, in the museum, they had a poster of the arch, showing how it was the end of a wire coat hanger that was sticking out of the ground.
Always wanted to find that poster again.