|
|
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
shifty
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 01:34 am |
|||||||||
|
StrayCat writes:
Whether we are behind in transit or not, we can't afford it. It would have to be started from the ground up. The tracks that already exist can't support high speed trains, and even if they could, there are STILL going to be low speed freight trains on them. Any idea what the cost of running all new tracks that are suitable for high speed trains is going to be? WAAAAAY more than we can afford right now. Secondly, I have to agree with Ron and a few others, I simply don't believe enough people would use it to merit the cost. Too many other things to work on, right now.
|
Posts: 3,610
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
themrs916
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 07:14 am |
|||||||||
|
rivermen1 writes:
It's rivermEn, and if you think I am looking stupid that means I am on the right track. Your stupid is real world common sense.
|
Posts: 4,634
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
Seal
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 09:26 am |
|||||||||
|
shifty writes:
StrayCat writes:
Whether we are behind in transit or not, we can't afford it. It would have to be started from the ground up. The tracks that already exist can't support high speed trains, and even if they could, there are STILL going to be low speed freight trains on them. Any idea what the cost of running all new tracks that are suitable for high speed trains is going to be? WAAAAAY more than we can afford right now. Secondly, I have to agree with Ron and a few others, I simply don't believe enough people would use it to merit the cost. Too many other things to work on, right now.
|
Posts: 9,264
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
Pock
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 09:55 am |
|||||||||
|
I've never even been on a bus.
|
Posts: 8,575
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
StfRon
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 10:19 am |
|||||||||
|
tapeworm writes:
I see... So your guys' explanation of why we don't need it, and why it won't work, is because we have cars. In other words, the "lower class" are the only people that use public transportation. Just another reason to vote for it as far as I'm concerned. You're sick of the government spending "your" money; I'm sick of people thinking they're better than everyone else.
|
Posts: 1,170
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
120202
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 11:22 am |
|||||||||
|
I sure hope no endangered animals rare threatened in the land grab. There are no "road crossings" where these operate, straight line, minimal grade. Considering the lay of the land, safety compliance will be difficult here. I do wonder what electric source will provide the energy, and other structural concerns that are unknown.
|
Posts: 1,676
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
AV8R
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 01:01 pm |
|||||||||
|
tapeworm writes:
I see... So your guys' explanation of why we don't need it, and why it won't work, is because we have cars. In other words, the "lower class" are the only people that use public transportation. Just another reason to vote for it as far as I'm concerned. You're sick of the government spending "your" money; I'm sick of people thinking they're better than everyone else.
|
Posts: 6,852
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
tapeworm
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 02:20 pm |
|||||||||
|
obviously we can afford it; it is on the table isn't it...?
|
Posts: 3,355
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
HipKat
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 03:31 pm |
|||||||||
|
Pock writes:
I've never even been on a bus.
|
Posts: 18,521
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
AV8R
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 03:41 pm |
|||||||||
|
tapeworm writes:
obviously we can afford it; it is on the table isn't it...?
|
Posts: 6,852
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
Pock
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 03:46 pm |
|||||||||
|
Everyday.
|
Posts: 8,575
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
HipKat
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 08:28 pm |
|||||||||
|
OK, to actually join in the conversation, of course we can't afford it. But we can't afford to keep increasing our dependance on oil, either, We can't afford to keep relying on cars, just 'cuz we have 'em. Ask people in NY City about using public transportation. How many business class passengers are there on planes? They don't have their cars when they get to their destination.
Hell, CILCO wants another increase. The way things are, people won't be able to afford their cars, when you add in gas, tax, and insurance increases..... It's pretty well known that mass transportation is something that needs to be developed. As for the $65.00 for a bus, ever ride a bus for a long distance? I did, a few times. Lawton, OK to Buffalo and back, and then Kansas City to Buffalo. It's a nightmare. I'll take paying double to get there faster and be more comfortable any time. |
Posts: 18,521
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
rivermen1
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 08:42 pm |
|||||||||
|
If you can't afford cars and gas- how do you get to the train depot? How do you get from the train depot to your final destination if it is a ways away from the depot?
|
Posts: 2,416
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
HipKat
|
Feb 19, 2011 - 08:43 pm |
|||||||||
|
How do people get to the airport? The Amtrak station??
|
Posts: 18,521
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Republicans short-sighted on high-speed rail
By:
AV8R
|
Feb 20, 2011 - 12:21 pm |
|||||||||
|
they usually drive their cars. I take Amtrak to Chicago when we go, but I damn sure don't walk or ride my bike to the station in Bloomington.
|
Posts: 6,852
|
|||||||||
|
|
![]() |
Post a Reply to this message » |


