|
Wednesday Sep. 8, 2010
|
|
Guns
By:
rivermen1
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 08:33 pm |
|
|
It is time to get the right to carry. You will have to go through a background check, waiting period, and a training course.
I think a person might think twice before robbing someone if they know this person may be armed. Why let these thugs on the street be the only ones that have guns. There are many stats telling if you give the right to carry the violent crimes will go down. It is time Peoria!! |
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
crodseth
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 08:52 pm |
|
|
You mean Illinois right? And, by Illinois, you might as well just say Chicago, because they are the ones that do not want a concealed carry law on the books.
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
JnJ *Peoria.com Moderator
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 08:58 pm |
|
|
Right on, Riverman! Did you go to the conceal carry rally last weekend downtown? I hear they had a good crowd and got some decent press. Next one will be a lot bigger ...
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
Chef Kevin
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 09:26 pm |
|
|
We wouldn't need the right to carry if they would make laws so severe that any illegally use or possession of a firearm would get you 30 year minimum, no time off for good behavior, no parole, in the clink. When you have a burglary conviction and two felony firearm convictions under your belt and THEN get a "possession of a stolen firearm by a felon" conviction and get TWO YEARS PROBATION, we need to get some new laws, judges, SOMETHING that isn't going to let these people walk.
Oh, and I'm all for concealed carry. |
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
AV8R
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 09:54 pm |
|
|
Chef Kevin writes:
We wouldn't need the right to carry if they would make laws so severe that any illegally use or possession of a firearm would get you 30 year minimum, no time off for good behavior, no parole, in the clink. When you have a burglary conviction and two felony firearm convictions under your belt and THEN get a "possession of a stolen firearm by a felon" conviction and get TWO YEARS PROBATION, we need to get some new laws, judges, SOMETHING that isn't going to let these people walk.
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
Pock
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:02 pm |
|
|
I should become a cop.
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
rivermen1
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:15 pm |
|
|
No i did not. I didn't even know about it. I did have a concealed liscence in Iowa when I lived there. I only used it when hunt, trapping. I needed it because I always carried it under my Carharts. I did take it twice to a rough place in Des Moines.
I loved the people that think we should just make it harder to get guns. They must think the criminals are going into Presleys, Gander Mountain and buying them. My dad alway said- I have never seen a gun walk down the road and shoot someone. |
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
leslie110
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:23 pm |
|
|
AV8R writes:
Chef Kevin writes:
We wouldn't need the right to carry if they would make laws so severe that any illegally use or possession of a firearm would get you 30 year minimum, no time off for good behavior, no parole, in the clink. When you have a burglary conviction and two felony firearm convictions under your belt and THEN get a "possession of a stolen firearm by a felon" conviction and get TWO YEARS PROBATION, we need to get some new laws, judges, SOMETHING that isn't going to let these people walk.
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
dirtycap2
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:31 pm |
|
|
Chef Kevin writes:
We wouldn't need the right to carry if they would make laws so severe that any illegally use or possession of a firearm would get you 30 year minimum, no time off for good behavior, no parole, in the clink. When you have a burglary conviction and two felony firearm convictions under your belt and THEN get a "possession of a stolen firearm by a felon" conviction and get TWO YEARS PROBATION, we need to get some new laws, judges, SOMETHING that isn't going to let these people walk. Oh, and I'm all for concealed carry.
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
leslie110
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:33 pm |
|
|
dirtycap2 writes:
Chef Kevin writes:
We wouldn't need the right to carry if they would make laws so severe that any illegally use or possession of a firearm would get you 30 year minimum, no time off for good behavior, no parole, in the clink. When you have a burglary conviction and two felony firearm convictions under your belt and THEN get a "possession of a stolen firearm by a felon" conviction and get TWO YEARS PROBATION, we need to get some new laws, judges, SOMETHING that isn't going to let these people walk. Oh, and I'm all for concealed carry.
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
crodseth
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:43 pm |
|
|
dirtycap2 writes:
Chef Kevin writes:
We wouldn't need the right to carry if they would make laws so severe that any illegally use or possession of a firearm would get you 30 year minimum, no time off for good behavior, no parole, in the clink. When you have a burglary conviction and two felony firearm convictions under your belt and THEN get a "possession of a stolen firearm by a felon" conviction and get TWO YEARS PROBATION, we need to get some new laws, judges, SOMETHING that isn't going to let these people walk. Oh, and I'm all for concealed carry.
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
dirtycap2
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:43 pm |
|
|
leslie110 writes:
dirtycap2 writes:
Chef Kevin writes:
We wouldn't need the right to carry if they would make laws so severe that any illegally use or possession of a firearm would get you 30 year minimum, no time off for good behavior, no parole, in the clink. When you have a burglary conviction and two felony firearm convictions under your belt and THEN get a "possession of a stolen firearm by a felon" conviction and get TWO YEARS PROBATION, we need to get some new laws, judges, SOMETHING that isn't going to let these people walk. Oh, and I'm all for concealed carry.
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
leslie110
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:46 pm |
|
|
It's ok...just giving you a hard time...
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
dirtycap2
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:47 pm |
|
|
No problem. Im used to it. I get that here.....
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
leslie110
|
Jul 29, 2010 - 10:53 pm |
|
|
crodseth writes:
You sexist SOB...anybody, male or female, could have shoved a sandwich down their pants!!! LOL....
|
|
|
|
Re: Guns
By:
AV8R
|
Jul 30, 2010 - 08:31 pm |
|
|
leslie110 writes:
They will still be prosecuting crack dealers they just made the mandatory sentencing more in line with what they are for cocaine.
|
|
|
|
|
Post a Reply
Please read the Peoria.com Community Agreement before posting to the Forums.
Have questions or problems with the Peoria.com forums?
Click here to contact us.
Counter: 623





