|
|
|
Re: Leslie
By:
AV8R
|
Oct 16, 2011 - 01:30 pm |
|||||||||
|
you're determination to twist my comments into a defense of Haliburton are not working hip. Give it up.
|
Posts: 6,883
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
HipKat
|
Oct 16, 2011 - 01:33 pm |
|||||||||
|
I don't need to help you twist your words up. You do a good enough job of that ob your own.
|
Posts: 18,567
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
AV8R
|
Oct 16, 2011 - 01:37 pm |
|||||||||
|
If you want another war Hip, I can delve into your history again. I see no need, but I'm game if you are.
Actually, I invite you to show me where in this thread I have defended the sole source contract to either Haliburton or Blackwater. Go ahead, you made the claim that somehow I've twisted myself up with my words. Back it up. |
Posts: 6,883
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
HipKat
|
Oct 16, 2011 - 03:04 pm |
|||||||||
|
The difference is that I used a real situation and you used a fictitious one. But it's OK. We're used to your Rebulicans can do no wrong attitude.
|
Posts: 18,567
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
AV8R
|
Oct 16, 2011 - 06:05 pm |
|||||||||
|
HipKat writes:
The difference is that I used a real situation and you used a fictitious one. But it's OK. We're used to your Rebulicans can do no wrong attitude.
|
Posts: 6,883
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
HipKat
|
Oct 16, 2011 - 06:25 pm |
|||||||||
|
Well, thanks for clearing that up
|
Posts: 18,567
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
joepyeweed
|
Jan 31, 2012 - 02:19 pm |
|||||||||
|
I think Bill Maher hit it on the head recently...
Conservatives make stuff up to generate fake opposition, while liberals tend to base their outrage stuff that was actually done. http://front.moveon.org/new-rules-with-bill-maher-wh |
Posts: 10,240
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
Seal
|
Jan 31, 2012 - 07:10 pm |
|||||||||
|
Bill Maher, really that's your credible nonpartisan source?
|
Posts: 9,264
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
AV8R
|
Jan 31, 2012 - 07:16 pm |
|||||||||
|
ya, no sh!t. And she links to moveon.org.
|
Posts: 6,883
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
HipKat
|
Jan 31, 2012 - 09:31 pm |
|||||||||
|
Doesn't seem like it's right to judge Maher if you don't watch him
|
Posts: 18,567
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
joepyeweed
|
Feb 1, 2012 - 07:24 am |
|||||||||
|
Just because a source is partisan, doesn't mean the point is automatically invalid.
|
Posts: 10,240
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
Chef Kevin
|
Feb 1, 2012 - 07:32 am |
|||||||||
|
HipKat writes:
Doesn't seem like it's right to judge Maher if you don't watch him
|
Posts: 10,783
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
Seal
|
Feb 1, 2012 - 07:56 am |
|||||||||
|
joepyeweed writes:
Just because a source is partisan, doesn't mean the point is automatically invalid.
|
Posts: 9,264
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
leslie110
|
Feb 1, 2012 - 09:30 am |
|||||||||
|
Joe may post links to some 'partisan' sites but at least her posts are more that ridiculous rhetoric.
|
Posts: 13,765
|
|||||||||
|
Re: Leslie
By:
HipKat
|
Feb 1, 2012 - 10:00 am |
|||||||||
|
Chef Kevin writes:
HipKat writes:
Doesn't seem like it's right to judge Maher if you don't watch him
|
Posts: 18,567
|
|||||||||
|
|
![]() |
Post a Reply to this message » |


